FDA legal challenge over Safety of Rwanda Act heard at Royal Courts of Justice
The FDA’s legal challenge relating to the relationship of the Civil Service Code with the UK government’s Safety of Rwanda (Asylum and Immigration) Act 2024 was heard at the Royal Courts of Justice on Thursday 6 June.
The union’s statement of facts, as presented to the court, outlines the timeline of events and why we felt we had no choice but to ask the court to intervene.
FDA General Secretary Dave Penman said:
“We did not take this legal challenge lightly, nor did we welcome it. We’ve also been clear that this legal challenge is not to the policy itself – that is a matter for Parliament. The government could have amended the Civil Service Code to make clear that the obligation to comply with international law does not apply in these circumstances. But instead, it chose to fudge the matter and issue guidance which it knows cannot override the Civil Service Code, any more than the instruction of a minister can.
“By leaving civil servants in an impossible position, we felt we had no choice but to ask the court to intervene.”
The FDA’s statement of facts relays our concerns around guidance issued by the Cabinet Office setting out the legal responsibilities of civil servants if the European Court of Human Rights grants interim measures that suspend the removal of an asylum-seeker to Rwanda, following the enactment of the Act.
The guidance states it is for ministers to decide whether to comply with an interim measure and that giving civil servants these instructions “would be operating in accordance with the Civil Service Code”. As the Civil Service Code requires civil servants to comply with both domestic and international law – to “uphold the rule of law and administration of justice” – the FDA believes that civil servants would in fact be acting contrary to the Civil Service Code if a minister were to instruct them to ignore this interim measure.
Civil servants have a legal obligation to follow the Civil Service Code – neither Ministers nor guidance can overrule that, only another act of parliament can.
We will provide a further update when the judgement is given.
Read more on why we’ve launched a judicial review of the Safety of Rwanda Act.
Related News
-
Why anonymous attacks must stop: Dave Penman on the “damage” caused by briefings
FDA General Secretary Dave Penman on the untold damage done by anonymous briefings against the civil service, and why this pattern needs to change.
-
Member focus: mentee into mentor
Member Sabrina Schalz applied for the Fast Stream (FS) whilst pregnant, and took her baby with her to the FS Base Camp. Katherine Hutchinson finds out more about the support Schalz received when navigating the FS application and her decision to become a mentor herself.
-
Reform UK’s plans to cut swathes of corporate functions without impacting frontline services “unrealistic”, says FDA
The FDA has responded to Reform UK’s proposals for civil service reform if the party enters government, which include plans to cut 68,500 jobs, a reduction of 13%.