The FDA joins legal challenge against government’s new regulations on use of agency workers during strikes

The FDA, along with ten other unions, has begun legal proceedings to protect the right to strike following the government’s new regulations which allow agency staff to cover striking employees. Although the FDA does not currently have any planned strike action among our membership we recognise that the right to strike is a fundamental British liberty and attacks against this cannot go unchallenged. The FDA’s Assistant General Secretary, Lucille Thirlby, said that “the FDA is proud to support this challenge”. Thirlby went on to argue that “during a cost-of-living crisis, the government should be working to resolve industrial disputes, not stoking them with legislation that undermines the fundamental legal right to strike.”
As reported in the Huffington Post and the Guardian, this judicial review has been launched because the eleven unions believe that these new regulations are not only wrong, but unlawful. The then Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, Kwasi Kwarteng, failed to consult unions over these changes – a requirement of the Employment Agencies Act 1973. This judicial review also appeals to international law, arguing the regulations violate fundamental trade union rights that are protected by Article 11 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Richard Arthur of Thompsons Solicitors LLP said: “The right to strike is respected and protected by international law including the Conventions of the ILO, an agency of the United Nations, and the European Convention on Human Rights.”
The eleven unions that have launched this judicial review (FDA, ASLEF, BFAWU, GMB, NEU, NUJ, POA, PCS, RMT, Unite and Usdaw) are represented by social justice and trade union specialists, Thompsons Solicitors LLP. In addition, UNISON and NASUWT have already launched legal cases against the government over the regulations. Together these unions represent more than four million workers from a diverse range of sectors within the economy.
The FDA and other unions are being supported by the TUC – to which the FDA is affiliated. The TUC’s General Secretary, Frances O’Grady, argued that the government’s new regulations mean “workers can’t stand up for decent services and safety at work – or defend their jobs and pay”.
Related News
-

“An outstanding leader with a proven track record” – FDA responds to Dame Antonia Romeo appointment
The FDA has welcomed the appointment of former Home Office Permanent Secretary Dame Antonia Romeo as Cabinet Secretary, following the departure of Sir Chris Wormald last week.
-

“New low” for government’s relationship with civil service – FDA responds following departure of Cabinet Secretary Chris Wormald
The FDA has responded to the announcement that Sir Chris Wormald has departed the role of Cabinet Secretary, with FDA General Secretary Dave Penman describing it as a “new low” for the government’s relationship with the civil service.
-

“Farcical” to wait until 2030 to make decision on restoration and renewal of parliament, says FDA
The FDA has responded to the latest publication of UK Parliament’s Restoration and Renewal Board, ‘Delivering restoration and renewal of the Palace of Westminster: the costed proposals.’