Agenda for International Development
As we launch a brand-new section of our union, the Association for Development and Diplomacy, we wanted to take stock and look at the competing priorities and challenges to the international development agenda.
Last year, one of the most dramatic changes to government structure occurred when the Foreign and Commonwealth Office (FCO) merged with the Department for International Development (DFID) to form the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO).
The announcement and subsequent merger saw a wide variety of reactions from charities, NGOs, academics and civil servants. For some, it was seen as an opportunity for the UK to have an even greater impact and influence on the rest of the world. However, many are unsure about the implications of the merger, both now and in the future. The recent reduction in the aid budget from 0.7 to 0.5% of Gross National Income (GNI) further complicates the picture and there are serious concerns that this will hinder the work of charities and NGOs, and potentially impact the UK’s global reputation.
This report looks at a range of issues connected with the development agenda, from the impact of the merger on the working lives of our civil servants to wider international developments on climate, trade and health.
Agenda for International Development by FDAunion on Scribd
Related News
-
Why anonymous attacks must stop: Dave Penman on the “damage” caused by briefings
FDA General Secretary Dave Penman on the untold damage done by anonymous briefings against the civil service, and why this pattern needs to change.
-
Member focus: mentee into mentor
Member Sabrina Schalz applied for the Fast Stream (FS) whilst pregnant, and took her baby with her to the FS Base Camp. Katherine Hutchinson finds out more about the support Schalz received when navigating the FS application and her decision to become a mentor herself.
-
Reform UK’s plans to cut swathes of corporate functions without impacting frontline services “unrealistic”, says FDA
The FDA has responded to Reform UK’s proposals for civil service reform if the party enters government, which include plans to cut 68,500 jobs, a reduction of 13%.